| Title |
9MME Website Demo |
| Title |
Extract of MME Manuscript #9 |
| Author |
Emerson, Mary Moody |
| Editor |
Baker, Noelle and Petrulionis, Sandy |
| Source |
The original source is a set of 12 manuscript pages from folder #9. That was transcribed in a diplomatic fashion using a word
processor, and the transcribed version was used as the source for this TEI transcription.
|
| Availability |
The editors’ transcriptions of Mary Moody Emerson’s Almanack manuscripts are reproduced courtesy of the Houghton Library,
Harvard University (bMS Am 1280.235 [385]). Ralph Waldo Emerson Memorial Association deposit.
|
----------[begin page 45]----------
knowledge and all the endless series of events which link these times, I behold
freedom of will like an Angel, sometimes terrible
& at others lovely, attending man, modified & influential—coulered
& distorted by circumstances—yet separate & individual. The
Be ing who created man must be infinite to all our
conceptions. He must be absolutely infinite & self ex istent
or we lose our hold of demonstration—of what is more & truer—our instuition—our consti tution—& we may as
well add, our selves. All gone without this Being.
Noon
Nothing can give perhaps so firm footing after all, as the
historical and demonstrable evi dence of the death & resurrection
of Jesus and the proofs of his divine
mission
Andrews Norton, Harvard’s Dexter lecturer in Biblical Criticism
since 1813, represents the Unitarians' positive effort to
prove by rational historical methods the authority of scripture; his eventual work on
the subject was Evidences of the Genuineness of the Gospels
(1837). Unitarianism is indebted to eighteenth-century
Enlightenment thinking and highlighted the rational and scientific nature of its
religious doctrines, therefore promoting free inquiry, and borrowing from German
higher criticism to interpret scripture. Unitarians balanced the
potentially irreligious liberality of their rational religion with an emphasis on the
importance of revealed religion, or documented evidence of Christianity
in the Bible, such as Jesus’s death,
resurrection, virgin birth, and miracles.
an001. With this history all others are mingled—arts & institutions—the
features of society whe ther defaced in dark & barbarous ages or
brightening beneath the light of letters & philosophy. Judaism
preserves it in p
rophe
cy & fullfillment.
Mohamedism bears
its
traces—Papacy
has inscribed its history in it’s rites & inquisitions.
20
Natural religion
Natural religion is a theological doctrine positing teleological
“argument from design,” i.e., that order in nature reflects divine
intention and proves the existence of the designer.
Mary Moody Emerson suggests that studies of nature’s design
must also consider “revealed religion” (see note an001) as
documented in the Judeo-Christian Bible. Nineteenth-century interpretations of natural
religion moved beyond Isaac Newton’s mechanistic description of a
universe ordered and controlled by natural laws; in its place, European scientists and
philosophers, from Samuel Taylor Coleridge and German Naturphilosophen to Louis Agassiz and
Charles Lyell, proposed organic explanations of nature’s
design, broadly conceived as spirit manifesting itself in matter.
an002 without revelation is like the elo
eolian harp without the air. And yet many souls are finely touched without recognizing it’s claims—but it
is from it’s remote influence—’tis by the agency of Him who gives to the sparrow
his instincts. Some sects are not willing to give the due worth to their virtue
s—because they are ignorant or shy of acknowledging it’s
source. It wd
seem better to outdo the sceptic
than in his fine
feelings and high honor than to condemn him. But
----------[begin page 46]----------
the poor ill organised xian often labours up the hill of duties heavily charged
with his orthodoxy— his creed & truly depraved nature and sheds a drop
of gall at every step and on every object which op poses his temper
& interest. His coldness will melt in the last purifying element—and his
prejudices pass away with the miseries of his life—he will rejoice with the
humbled and disciplined pretenders to nat ural religion who vainly imajined
they saw God in every thing when it was the idol of their own beauty
& rectitude they worshiped. They
will with the most exalted of deists view thier virtues with shame
after beholding the vision of God—and exclaim in his remarkable language tho’ I were perfect I would not know it.
From
Job 9:21
: “Though I were perfect, yet would I not know my soul: I would despise
my life.”
an003
Noon
De Natura Deorum
were Dr Beecher to concede—or
rather to attempt an explanation of what admits of none—says “sin is not a
phisical property of the soul but voluntary.” This is
unitarianism. To say it is a phi. property I dare not—yet observation
of the “constitutional sin
Annotation in process to identify this common term in nineteenth-century theology,
meaning the sin that we most often commit or cannot avoid committing.
an004”
Marcus Tullius Cicero (106-43 BCE) was a Roman statesman,
orator, and writer; he authoritatively summarized Roman theology in De Natura
Deorum (45 BCE). Lyman
Beecher (1775-1863) had been minister of the Hanover
Church in Boston since 1826 and from
there was leading a new school of Calvinism in opposition to Unitarian
doctrine. Mary Moody Emerson is quoting from Beecher’s
February 1825 response in the Christian
Spectator to an adversarial January 1824
Christian Examiner review of his 15 October
1823 sermon, The Faith Once Delivered to the Saints. The
reviewer charged Beecher with being “unsound in his
orthodoxy” and characterized Beecher as more of a
Unitarian than a true Calvinist
(Christian Examiner and Theological Review [January/February
1824]: 50) . In the sermon’s discussion of human depravity and free agency,
Beecher had refuted aspersions of Calvinism by
asserting that “God governs the moral world by such irresistible influence, that
crimes are as much a matter of physical necessity, as rain and sunshine”
(Sermons Delivered on Various Occasions [Boston, 1828],
226) . In his lengthy reply to the Christian Examinerreviewer,
Beecher defends the terms and beliefs expressed in his sermon:
“That man is a free agent, in the possession of such powers as lays a
foundation for moral government;—that original sin is not a physical property of the
soul, but voluntary and accountable” (327). Later in this response,
Beecher cites Cicero’s
De Natura Deorum as analogous of early Christians’ imperfect
understanding: “The darkness of the world before the Sun of Righteousness arose,
is affectingly illustrated by Cicero in his treatise De
Natura Deorum, in which he himself and all the philosophers, have the
appearance of children, attempting in vain to ascertain what there is above the
skies” (352).
an005
leaves one in the dark—and so do the scriptures. And it is intirely right—we live by faith in the perfect character of God.
One of the ear ly calvinists—for it did
exist early tho’ not in name, said the essence of the soul was sinfull. He was
excommunicated.
Annotation in process to identify “one of the early
calvinists.”
an006
Dr B. is more prudent, not so log
ical perhaps.
21
So peculiarly marked that I need peculiar magnimity to
get thro’ changes with their attendants. But fervid humble repentance works the same
indifference to accomodation
----------[begin page 47]----------
25
To wish to live to be better is to calculate smalely. Trust Thee with my unbodied
soul as well as in a dark case. The rewards of virtue be at thy own disposal. I
deserve nothing—ask for nothing but to love Thee for ever. It were sweet to
have such a friend as I imajine weep over my bed. Then death would be imbittered.
But to be thought of—pho! If friendship would for
get faults the naked spirit would blot them. It is written many years since in
an Al. that to have the poor people who come to this house to bury me say I was
simple & affectionate was enough. Less than that will do. I said in earliest
period of piety that tho’ ponderous ages intervened, by the grave, yet I should see God.
28.
Sept
“That reason as the antients
Platonists &
Origen say was an emanation from God—the divine
nature diffused thro’ all human souls, and comprehended in it the principles and ele
ments of all truth human & divine
Mary Moody Emerson quotes from German Enlightenment scholar and
religious historian Johann Lorenz Mosheim
(1693-1755), whose An Ecclesiastical History, Ancient and
Modern (1755) was published and translated in multiple British
and American editions in the nineteenth century: “Its mystic theology’s first promoters proceeded from that known doctrine of
the Platonic school, which also was adopted by Origen and his
disciples, that the divine nature was diffused through all human souls;
or, in other words, that the faculty of reason, from which proceeds the
health and vigour of the mind, was an emanation from God into the human soul,
and comprehended in it the principles and elements of all truth, human and
divine”
(An Ecclesiastical History, Ancient and Modern, from the Birth of Christ,
to the Beginning of the Present Century, trans. Archibald Maclaine, D.D.,
4 vols. [New York, 1824], 1:215) . In this work, Mosheim
explicates mystic theology and its roots in the teachings of
Plato (429-347 BCE) and Origen
Adamantius (c. 185-c. 254), the greatest adaptor of
Plato’s ideas. Note: Mary Moody Emerson
often neglects to include either open or close quotation marks to indicate the extent
of her quoted material. In an effort to preserve the authentic quality of this
manuscript, editors do not supply such quotation marks when the full text of
Mary Moody Emerson’s source, as above, is provided in the
Annotation.
an007”
is in accord with the best modern phi. w’h teaches that the mind con tains all the principles of science.
The seed that never sprouts still contains the tree. And these germs were
never fully developed but by the instrume
ntality of xianity.
an008
The more the phi., the nature, of mind is known the more clear the
dispensation of gospel. But the abuse of this platonic text tended
to quiet mysticism—& suits my age, at times, most sweetly. Tho’ in the me ditations of a deep mind may be developed priciples w’h
spurn at study. The humble mystic muses.
See Mosheim, An Ecclesiastical History ( note an007), 1:215: Mystic theologians “denied that men could, by
labour or study, excite this celestial flame in their breasts; and therefore, they
disapproved highly of the attempts of those who, by … profound speculations,
endeavoured to form distinct notions of truth, and to discover its hidden nature. On
the contrary, they maintained, that silence, tranquility, repose, and
solitude … were the means by which the hidden and
internal word was excited to produce its latent virtues, and
to instruct men in the knowledge of divine things.”
an009
----------[begin page 48]----------
----------[begin page 49]----------
This manuscript fascicle is divided at this page into two sections. The preceding 47
pages are written upside down from the remaining eight pages, which begin a new series
of entries at what is the last page of the original fascicle.
tn035
:Waterford W June 1 W
Possibly, the two uncancelled instances of “W” are false starts for
Waterford.
tn010
June 1827
It is rather dull to read Cicero’s life—so much
corruption & woe. He says gloriously that “we do nothing for the
publick but in expectation of the future. As the minds of men therfore seem to be
divine & immortal for many other reasons so especially for this that in the wisest & best
there is so stronge a sense of somthing here after, that they seem to relish
nothing but what is eternal.”
Mary Moody Emerson paraphrases Cicero’s
speech Pro Rabirio perduellionis reo (63 BCE)
on behalf of Gaius Rabirius, as quoted by Conyers
Middleton in The Life of Marcus Tullius Cicero, 3 vols.
(Boston: Wells and Lilly, 1818), 1:174: “There is not one of us who exerts
himself with praise and virtue in the dangers of the republick, but is induced to it
by the expectation of a futurity. As the minds of men therefore seem to be divine
and immortal for many other reasons, so especially for this, that, in all the best
and wisest, there is so strong a sense of something hereafter, that they seem to
relish nothing but what is eternal.”
an011
Alas how much fear & despondency he felt when exiled—joy &
rapture it revealed. Alas to
o what good did he eventually
do wealthy & noble as he was Had
Cateline destroyed the City it would be
sooner at peace
Catiline (Lucius Sergius Catilina) (c.
108-62 BCE) was a Roman nobleman and conspirator. In 63 and
62 BCE, he was defeated for the consulship by
Cicero; in response, he planned an uprising that was
suppressed. His fellow conspirators were executed, and he died in battle in
Etruria. Cicero was hailed as savior of
Rome but was open to the charge of having executed citizens
without trial.
an012
It is pitifull that so good & great a man sd be embroiled —that he sd be vain of publick applause—that he had not adhered to the supposed oracle.
I find
in
Pompey & Ceasar nothing to
respect but the reverse.
Pompeius Magnus, Gnaeus, Pompey (also Pompey the
Great) (106-48 BCE) was a Roman general and statesman who was assassinated
in Egypt after pitting himself against
Caesar. Mary Moody Emerson refers to
Julius Caesar, Gaius (100-44 BCE), a Roman military and
political leader who eventually became dictator of the entire Roman world. He was
assassinated on 15 March 44 BCE by a group of senators
led by his friend Marcus Junius Brutus (85-42 BCE), who hoped to
restore the Republic to its former condition.
an013
So much for the first vol. No, it was in this that he
was initiated into the Elusinian mysteries.
The Eleusinian Mysteries were secret initiation ceremonies into the cult of
Demeter and Persephone, originating at
Eleusis in Greecearound 600 BCE and continuing for approximately 2,000 years.
Worshippers were believed to unite with the gods during these rites. The festivities
were held primarily in the spring to symbolize Persephone’s
return from the Underworld, and those involved described
sublime experiences or visions of the afterlife. As Mary Moody
Emerson understood from her reading, in Germany,
Germaine de Staël uses the Eleusinian Mysteries to suggest that
“there were, perhaps, of old, more intimate relations between man and nature
than now exist. The mysteries of Eleusis … are vestiges of some curious attraction
which united man with the universe” (Germany; by the Baroness Staël
Holstein, 3 vols., [New York, 1814], 2:199). See Mary Moody
Emerson to Ralph Waldo Emerson, 18 January 1821, where she refers to De
Staël’s explanation of the mysteries of Eleusis
(The Selected Letters of Mary Moody Emerson, ed. Nancy Craig Simmons
[Athens: U of Georgia P, 1993], 139).
an014
Infidels need not flout at xians being renewed in their existence by the
vision of the gospel—when those of Elysian &
Pur
gatory had such an effect on one of the greatest. Whence came
these notions? From nature or revelation (or traditeory both) correspond both!
14
second vol. Alas Cicero has compromised —become aristocrat with prudence. Well I know not that he could have avoided it. But
surely it seems he makes too much of his one years
consulship
See note an005 for identification of Cicero, who
served as consul of Rome from 63-62 BCE, elected at age 42, the
youngest age permitted.
an015—what (again I ask) did it essentially do? How can so pure a mind
(compar
atively) love the fame of times so degenerate?
Sab
I fin
----------[begin page 50]----------
ished in two or three days the 2. vol. with a
doler
ous feelings. Cicero returns but clogged with
obliga
tions—& to what—what times. Cesars
usurpation was better than the mob.
See note an013 for identification of Caesar and his
assassination.
an016
I remember nothing save the history of what C. had
written, that is worth remembering in his speeches (w’h were extorted from him too often for the cause of the vicious) but one
to Cesar about his name & re storing
the liberty. Whatever Cesars guilt was the
people were safer except a name. Had it not been for the
principles of our first Settlers, Washington might have
been a Cesar.
George Washington (1732-1799) was an American general and
statesman who served two terms as the first president of the United
States (1789-1797). Washington was honored for his
leadership during the War of Independence with parades and other
ceremonies. Despite this public praise and support, and in part because of his
advanced age, Washington set the example for future presidents by
stepping down from office in order to avoid monarchical tendencies, a decision he
explained in his Farewell Address in 1796. The 22nd Amendment to the
Constitution, ratified in 1947, states that no one may be elected to the
executive office more than twice.
an017
But to our Country what a loss—to Rome
none. We admire & respect Cicero’s adherence to the
cause of Pompey (not his flattery of him) & the
Repub lick—it was nessecary to his character were there no other
world. But when living with his books we venerate him. When
imitating Plato in writing Laws he says in laying open
“the origin of law & the source of obligation he derives them from
the universal nature of things or from the consumate
reason or will of the Supreme God.”
Plato’s last dialogue is entitled Laws.
Mary Moody Emerson refers to and quotes from
Middleton’s
Life of Marcus Tullius Cicero ( note an011), 2:166-67:
“Cicero chose to deliver his political sentiments in
the same method; not by translating Plato, but imitating his
manner in the explication of them. … In the first of these, he lays open “the
origin of law and the source of obligation; which he derives from the universal
nature of things, or, as he explains it, from the consummate reason or will of the
supreme God.””
an018
It is noticeable that the heathen would not admit the validity of
any law w’h was made while the Augurs were consulting the Heavens
But the corrupt overruled this at times & at others made use of
religion to set aside justice.
Middleton (see note an011) refers broadly to
Greeks as “heathens” throughout his volumes, as in
Life of Marcus Tullius Cicero 1:xxviii. See note an005
for identification of Cicero, who was elected an augur in 52 BCE. Augurs were counselors and priests who controlled the
observation of auspices, or divine portents. As Middleton
suggests, they held the power to guide political leaders by responding to questions of
the senate or magistrates based on the omens or signs they witnessed; moreover, they
controlled the governing power to postpone an assembly or report its results invalid
because of negative auspices. Middleton, Life of Marcus
Tullius Cicero, 2:29: “It was … unlawful … to convene an assembly,
while the magistrate was in the act of observing the heavens.”
Middleton references numerous examples of the political abuse of
augurs’ power; see Life of Marcus Tullius Cicero, 1:305; 2:27-28, 422.
an019
Cicero
----------[begin page 51]----------
had his share of good fortune & comfort tho’ naturally ti
mid & desponding—for he wrote. The events w’h a man can revolve in his own mind by letters are worth the whole world
of crowded hours. But he does not captivate the whole soul—inlarge it as when discover
ing the tomb of Archemedies. T'was he loved pure intellect
—thought lightly of his art when applied to purposes of life The cylinder
remained on his monument
136
138
years before C. found it in Syracuse.
Archimedes (c. 287-c. 212-11 BCE) was a Greek mathematician and
inventor. His tomb in Syracuse depicted a cylinder
circumscribing a sphere, with the ratio 3:2 that he discovered between them. According
to Middleton (see note an011),
Cicero visited the tomb and found the cylinder years later
(Middleton, Life of Marcus Tullius Cicero, 1:68).
an020
This a most sultry day 11 of July.
Au. 21
Read the last vol. of C. with sadness for poor hu man
nature’s sake. And all of Cicero’s labours to save
Rome thus ended! The shade of sorrow at his death had
been brightened had he been suc cessfull. But he lived for posterity—for
man kind & his memorial will not perish as one says “while the system of nature lasts
Quoted from Velleius Paterculus’s
Compendium of Roman History concerning the death of
Cicero, as quoted in Middleton’s
Life of Marcus Tullius Cicero (see note an011): “He
lives and will live in the memory of all ages; and as long as this system of nature,
whether by chance or providence, or what way soever formed, which he alone, of all
the Romans, comprehended in his mind, and illustrated by his eloquence,
shall remain entire” (3:289).
an021”
I say while politicks & civil freedom are to be agitated “True glory he said is a wide & illustrious fame
of many & great benefits con
fered upon our friends our Country or the whole race of mankind—not the
applause of the giddy mul titude
Quoted from Cicero’s speech Pro Marcello (51 BC) on behalf of Marcus Claudius
Marcellus, in
Middleton’s
The Life of Marcus Tullius Cicero
(see note an011): “True glory, then, according to his own
definition of it, is “a wide and illustrious fame of many and great benefits
conferred upon our friends, our country, or the whole race of mankind: it is not,
(he says,) the empty blast of popular favour, or the applause of a giddy
multitude”” (3:308).
an022”
22
Tully should not be blamed (as I have
per sumed to) for his bringing forward his services—the time forced
him—& the contempt he must (I think) have felt for the world, rendered him
so superior that he told them of his services as he would have
con
----------[begin page 52]----------
convisnced
Mary Moody Emerson wrote “con” as the last word
of preceding page, and a poorly formed “convinced” at the start of this
page.
tn024
children who were forsaking their parents.
Annotation in process. Mary Moody Emerson refers to
Cicero as Tully, a common abbreviation for
him.
an023
It is pity that he could not have been wholly devoted to books—we dont
love to see him contending & bawling tho’ the great cause of liberty was the object in the latter years. Middleton has erred in judgment if he thinks
Brutus' last letter to Tully places
B. in a poor light.
an025
It is better to me than any thing in the book on liberty. It carries the marks of his temper hence Cicero gives a most
sublime description of the immu
tabil
ity
law of
“right reason w’h he calls the true law—cannot be overruled—nor abrogated—to seek no
commentator on it but itself. God the inventor propounder & enactor of
it—and whoever will not obey it must throw off the nature of man & renounce himself in doing w’h he will suffer the greatest punishment tho’ he should escape all the other torments
commonly believed to be prepared for
the wicked.”
“The study of this law wd enable us to know our true nature & rank in the universal
system When a man has attentively surveyed the
H.
the earth
the sea & all things in them—observed whence they
sprung & whither they tend; when & how they are to end; what
part is perishable & mortal, what divine & eternal; when he has
reached & touched; as it were
----------[begin page 53]----------
the governor & ruler of them all, and discovered him
self not to be confined to the walls of any certain place, but a citizen of
the world as of one common city; in this magnificint view of things; in this
in larged prospect
& knowledge of nature; good gods, how will he
learn to know himself? How will he contemn, dispise and set at nought all
those things w’h the vulgar esteem the most splendid & glorious!”
Mary Moody Emerson variously quotes and paraphrases from
Middleton, Life of Marcus Tullius Cicero (see
note an011), 3:353-54, who is quoting Cicero,
De Legibus (On the Laws [52
BCE]): “ “The true law,” says he, “is right reason,
conformable to the nature of things; constant, eternal, diffused through all;
which calls us to duty by commanding, deters us from sin by forbidding; which
never loses its influence with the good; nor ever preserves it with the wicked.
This cannot possibly be overruled by any other law; nor abrogated in the whole or
in part: nor can we be absolved from it either by the senate or the people: nor
are we to seek any other comment or interpreter of it, but itself: nor can there
be one law at Rome, another at
Athens; one now, another hereafter; but the same eternal,
immutable law, comprehends all nations, at all times, under one common Master and
Governour of all, God. He is the inventor, propounder, enacter of this law: and
whosoever will not obey it, must first renounce himself, and throw off the nature
of man: by doing which, he will suffer the greatest punishment, though he should
escape all the other torments which are commonly believed to be prepared for the
wicked.””
“In another place, he tells us, that the study of this law was the only
important thing which could teach us that most important of all lessons, said to be
prescribed by the Pythian Oracle, to know ourselves; that is, to know our
true nature and rank in the universal system; the relation that we bear to all other
beings; and the purposes for which we were sent into the world. “When a
man,” says he, “has attentively surveyed the
heavens, the earth, the sea, and all
things in them; observed whence they sprung, and whither they all tend; when and
how they are to end; what part is mortal and perishable, what divine and eternal:
when he has almost reached and touched, as it were, the governour and ruler of
them all, and discovered himself not to be confined to the walls of any certain
place, but a citizen of the world, as of one common city; in this magnificent view
of things; in this enlarged prospect and knowledge of nature; good Gods, how will
he learn to know himself? How will he contemn, despise, and set at
ought all those things, which the vulgar esteem the most splendid and
glorious?””
an026 Even if these sentiments were not permanent & rather the ef
fect of oratory they are so applicable to the be liever in
revelation—so admirable and sincere for the times he was under their dominion that
they deserve to be transcribed in marble. Tho
the how he came to the knowledge of this law is
questionable. However grand & expressive the events of nature may
be—they do not talk but to the initiated. He benefited by ages &
books—& they were connected by a primitive revelation. For the signs of
nature are not invaribly those of benvolence and impartiality. Inanimate &
animate poison & distroy each other—there seems rather a warfare than
equity—And, in society he saw no thing but war & injustice—that
surely is an im
Elm Vale E.lm V April
In 1813 Mary Moody Emerson had purchased a farm in the foothills
of the White Mountains in South Waterford,
Maine, calling it Elm Vale or Vale. She sold it
in 1850 when she could no longer pay taxes on the property.
an027
----------[begin page 54]----------
portant part of nature. Others had watched the stars—but their vigils left them
bewildered in atheism—and had explored the secrets of nature with the
instruments of science w’h unfolded the measures of space & the mechanism of the insect
& flower. Seeing they see not
From
Matthew 13:13
: “Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not;
and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand.”
an028. Oh could Cicero
have read this law expounded & inforced by the Son of God! Could he have
known as well as others the origin & predicted the end of this world how
indeed would he have set at nought the triumph—the applause of poor old Rome. Or
indeed of “all honest men.”
Tully in his book of laws pursued this
argument and deduced “the origin of law from the will of God.”
Mary Moody Emerson is quoting from Middleton’s
Life of Marcus Tullius Cicero ( note an011): “In his
Book of Laws, he pursued the same argument, and deduced the origin
of law from the will of the Supreme God” (3:355).
an029
And whatever origin right may have independent on any will—the rules by w’h this right is established and promulg
ed will be found to originate in the will—atherity
of God. But how invaluable is the view of this hero
in morals
contemplating nature, till he rose from earth in the vast
idea of it’s Auther and the immensity of of His plans! Habitually, tho' with the interruption of disponding hours, he believed in this Auther and
his providence and of course in the immortality of soul.
----------[begin page 55]----------
Au. 24
That Tully improved on the academick school
Arsesilas who said that “tho’ he did not affirm there was no such thing as truth, but all truths have some falshood annexed to them of so near a
re
semblance & similitude as to afford no certain note of
distinction.”
Arcesilas (316/5 - 242/1 BCE) was a Greek philosopher who headed
the Academy (the philosophical school founded by
Plato) from c. 268 BCE. He is credited with founding the
New Academy because he introduced skepticism into
Plato’s school. His thesis that “nothing can be
grasped” argued against the Stoics’ belief that truth could be
certainly achieved through sense impressions. Mary Moody Emerson
paraphrases Cicero’s
De Natura Deorum (45 BCE), as quoted by
Middleton in Life of Marcus Tullius Cicero (see
note an011): “Again; we do not pretend to say, that there is no
such thing as truth; but that all truths have some falsehoods annexed to
them, of so near a resemblance and similitude, as to afford no certain note of
distinction” (3:332).
an030
Now the first of all truths about God—his moral character have no falshood,
and Cic
ero
wd have said so. Tho we cannot compre
hend the vastness of one attribute yet we know that it is unmixed with evil.
We are glad that he rejected a minute attention to physicks
ra ther amusing than improving. Ah could he have presided over the
state as an angel—without those judicial quirks w’h disturbed his serenity and the practice of habitual truth what a gift
to mankind his memory.
an031
This love of existing in fame, well earnt, would never have so
influ
enced him but that it was an immortal appetite. True, as a final cause, were God
to choose to conduct this world to mere mortal perfection the love of
distinction would exist. But it would be illusive and therefore man is immortal.
With
out this the quiet of the sheep is far better than the victory of the lion. Oh
no this sentiment of fu
----------[begin page 56]----------
turity would not have existed without a God such as the bible—then it must be
for higher pur poses than social & civil. All the ends it has
an swerd has left the system and the individual so in
complete that it could not be for present utility.
25 of Au
Farewell, Marcus Tullius Cicero! Thro’ Him whom in the days of thy travail thou knewest not, thou art perfected. Joy & honor attend thy
course! Thro’ Him I may be advanced to converse with thee—then we will talk of the spot hallowed by genius, which thou
foundst in Syracuse! Farewell! I close thy history to pursue
or ra ther transmute thro’ the remnant of days w’h
this anniversary of my birth
Mary Moody Emerson was born 25 August
1774 in Concord, Massachusetts. Here, she refers to
her 53rd birthday.
an032
brings along. For me the sun is as bright as it shone on thy pompous
Villas—and the shades more sweet for they are the wild growth of the nature
& make a part of the system thou lovedst!
In thy light to breathe to be
Oh Joy! Heart & strenght & soul em
ploy oh my God, in loving Thee
Tho’ my path is drear stars of hope
are shining here.
Mary Moody Emerson is misquoting the last stanza of The
Mariner by Vasily Andreyevich Zhukovsky (1783-1852), a
poem she’d likely read in Specimens of Russian Poets, with Preliminary Remarks
and Biographical Notices (trans. John Bowring [London, 1821], 75). Zhukovsky
is widely recognized as the father of Russian Romanticism and is most famous for his
translation of the Odyssey from German into Russian. The last stanza of
The Mariner reads as follows:
O unutterable joy!
In Thy light to breathe, to be;
Strength and heart and soul employ,
Oh my God, in loving Thee.
Though my path were dark and drear,
Holiest visions round me rise;
Stars of hope are smiling there,
Smiling down from Paradise.
an033
Would I could take leave without returning to thy joy (too too personal) at the
murder of Ceasar
For Caesar’s assassination, see note an013
an034. Twas vain